Emergency Department Utilization Research Articles

Abstract PO1-10-03: Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Food Insecurity and Other Adverse Social Determinants of Health Among Breast Oncology Patients

Abstract Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH), the non-medical factors that influence health status, have a profound impact on breast cancer (BC) outcomes and contribute to survival disparities. Food insecurity (FI), defined as a lack of consistent access to adequate food resources, is a modifiable SDOH associated with treatment disruptions, medication nonadherence, and decreased quality of life. To identify at-risk patients and inform future interventions, we implemented SDOH screening of patients seen in breast oncology clinic at our urban academic medical center. Methods: Screening was conducted through an 8-item questionnaire on the electronic patient portal. The questions covered FI, housing and transportation challenges, and emergency department (ED) visits. We conducted a retrospective analysis of SDOH data collected among patients scheduled for a breast oncology appointment between 11/1/22 and 5/25/23. Any level of food hardship or concern constituted a positive FI screen. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence of FI and other SDOH, to assess differences in FI rates by age, race/ethnicity, and clinical stage, and to compare characteristics of food-insecure vs food-secure patients. We also conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) associated with sociodemographic/clinical factors and FI. Results: A total of 2,585 patients were seen in our breast oncology practice, of which 1,189 (46.0%) were screened for SDOH, including 41.2% non-Hispanic White (NHW), 9.6% non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and 21.0% Hispanic patients. Among patients who responded to each SDOH question, 15.5% (146/940) reported some level of FI; 8.7% (84/962) were unable to pay their rent or mortgage on time; for 5.8% (57/989), lack of transportation interfered with their treatment. The FI rate differed significantly by race and ethnicity: 4.5% of NHW, 15.2% of NHB, and 41.8% of Hispanic patients reported FI (p< 0.001). In multivariable analysis, NHB and Hispanic patients also had significantly higher odds of FI compared to NHW patients (OR=3.68, 95% CI=1.7-7.7, p< 0.001 for NHB and OR=15.0, 95% CI=8.8-27.1, p< 0.001 for Hispanic patients). Patients with metastatic disease had higher rates of FI compared to other breast oncology patients (23.6% vs 14.8%, p=0.048), and a metastatic BC diagnosis was associated with over twice the odds of FI (OR=2.18, 95% CI=1.1-4.2, p=0.02). Among food-insecure patients, 41.1% were unable to pay their rent or mortgage on time and 22.6% reported transportation difficulties interfering with treatment (vs 2.6% and 2.4%, respectively, for food-secure patients (p< 0.001)). Compared to food-secure patients, those who were food-insecure had significantly higher rates of self-reported ED visits in the past 12 months: 18.8% vs. 33.6% reported at least 1 ED visit, respectively, and 5.2% vs. 16.4% reported multiple ED visits, respectively (p< 0.001). Conclusions: In this analysis of SDOH data among patients seen in breast oncology clinic, FI was the most common social health risk reported, with nearly a quarter of patients with metastatic BC reporting FI. Racial/ethnic minorities were also at considerably higher risk for FI. ED utilization was significantly higher among food-insecure patients. Targeted interventions to reduce FI in at-risk populations are warranted to improve clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics and Other Reported Social Determinants of Health Among Food-Secure vs Food-Insecure Patients Citation Format: Claire Sathe, David DeStephano, Anita Gul, Melissa Beauchemin, Justine Kahn, Melissa Accordino, Katherine Crew, Ngozika Emezienna, Dawn Hershman. Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Food Insecurity and Other Adverse Social Determinants of Health Among Breast Oncology Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-03.

Health Care Utilization by Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain.

To describe the patterns of health care utilization among patients with chronic pelvic pain. Deidentified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse were used. Adult female patients who had their first medical claim for chronic pelvic pain between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were included. Utilization was examined for 12 months after the index diagnosis. The greedy nearest neighbor matching method was used to identify a control group of individuals without chronic pelvic pain. Comparisons were made between those with and those without chronic pelvic pain using χ2 tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous data. In total, 18,400 patients were analyzed in the chronic pelvic pain cohort. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had a higher rate of chronic overlapping pain conditions. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had higher rates of health care utilization across all queried indices. They had more outpatient office visits; 55.5% had 10 or more office visits. Patients with chronic pelvic pain showed higher utilization of the emergency department (ED) (6.3 visits vs 1.9 visits; P<.001). Urine culture and pelvic ultrasonography were the most utilized tests. One-third of patients with chronic pelvic pain utilized physical therapy (PT), and 13% utilized psychological or behavioral therapy. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had higher rates of hysterectomy (8.9% vs 0.6%). The average total health care costs per patient with chronic pelvic pain per year was $12,254. Patients with chronic pelvic pain have higher rates of chronic overlapping pain conditions and undergo more ED visits, imaging tests, and hysterectomies than patients without chronic pelvic pain. Improving access to multidisciplinary care, increasing utilization of interventions such as PT and psychological or behavioral therapy, and reducing ED utilization may be possible targets to help reduce overall health care costs and improve patient care.

National Emergency Department Utilization by Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

National Emergency Department Utilization by Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Emergency Department Use in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Early Survivors from 2006 to 2020.

Purpose: Understanding emergency department (ED) use in adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors could identify gaps in AYA survivorship. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of 7925 AYA survivors (aged 15-39 years at diagnosis) who were 2-5 years from diagnosis in 2006-2020 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. We calculated ED utilization rates overall and by indication of the encounter (headache, cardiac issues, and suicide attempts). We estimated rate changes by survivorship year and patient factors associated with ED visit using a Poisson model. Results: Cohort was 65.4% women, 45.8% Hispanic, with mean age at diagnosis at 31.3 years. Overall, 38% of AYA survivors had ≥1 ED visit (95th percentile: 5 ED visits). Unadjusted ED rates declined from 374.2/1000 person-years (PY) in Y2 to 327.2 in Y5 (p change < 0.001). Unadjusted rates declined for headache, cardiac issues, and suicide attempts. Factors associated with increased ED use included: age 20-24 at diagnosis [relative risk (RR) = 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.56 vs. 35-39 years]; female (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.47 vs. male); non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.38-1.95 vs. non-Hispanic white); comorbidity (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.55 for 1 and RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.40-2.30 for 2+ vs. none); and public insurance (RR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.70-2.32 vs. private). Compared with thyroid cancer, cancers associated with increased ED use were breast (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.24-1.70), cervical (RR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.76-2.71), colorectal (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.94-2.81), and sarcoma (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88). Conclusion: ED utilization declined as time from diagnosis elapsed, but higher utilization was associated with social determinants of health and cancer types.

Social determinants of health and emergency department visits among older adults with multimorbidity: insight from 2010 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey

BackgroundMultimorbidity is prevalent among older adults and is associated with adverse health outcomes, including high emergency department (ED) utilization. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are associated with many health outcomes, but the association between SDoH and ED visits among older adults with multimorbidity has received limited attention. This study aimed to examine the association between SDoH and ED visits among older adults with multimorbidity.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted among 28,917 adults aged 50 years and older from the 2010 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more self-reported diseases among 10 common chronic conditions, including diabetes, hypertension, asthma, stroke, cancer, arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart, kidney, and liver diseases. The SDoH assessed included race/ethnicity, education level, poverty income ratio, marital status, employment status, insurance status, region of residence, and having a usual place for medical care. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between SDoH and one or more ED visits.ResultsParticipants’ mean (± SD) age was 68.04 (± 10.66) years, and 56.82% were female. After adjusting for age, sex, and the number of chronic conditions in the logistic regression model, high school or less education (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.19), poverty income ratio below the federal poverty level (AOR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.31–1.59), unmarried (AOR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11–1.28), unemployed status (AOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.23–1.44), and having a usual place for medical care (AOR: 1.46, 95% CI 1.18–1.80) was significantly associated with having one or more ED visits. Non-Hispanic Black individuals had higher odds (AOR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.19–1.38), while non-Hispanic Asian individuals had lower odds (AOR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59–0.86) of one or more ED visits than non-Hispanic White individuals.ConclusionSDoH factors are associated with ED visits among older adults with multimorbidity. Systematic multidisciplinary team approaches are needed to address social disparities affecting not only multimorbidity prevalence but also health-seeking behaviors and emergent healthcare access.

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position in emergency department utilization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim: Evaluate the association of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP) on emergency department (ED) visits for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which may reflect access to and quality of cancer care. Materials & methods: Patients with HCC identified from a commercial multi-payer claims database between 2015 and2018 were matched to near-neighborhood social determinants of health (SDOH) and stratified by race/ethnicity and SEP (proxied by annual household income). Analyses evaluated the effect of race/ethnicity and SEP on ED utilization, adjusting for SDOH, demographic and clinical characteristics using multivariable regression methods. Results: A total of22,247 patients were included. Black and Hispanic patients had 43and 18% higher ED utilization than White patients at higher-income levels (p<0.01); these differences were nonsignificant at lower-income. Regardless of income level, Asian patients had lower ED utilization. Conclusion: Further research on the intersectionality between race/ethnicity, SEP and other SDOH may guide structural-level interventions to address health inequities.

Engagement in GI Behavioral Health Is Associated with Reduced Portal Messages, Phone Calls, and ED Visits.

Chronic digestive disorders are associated with increased costs for healthcare systems and often require provision of both urgent care and non-face-to-face (non-F2F) care, such as responding to patient messages. Numerous benefits of integrated gastroenterology (GI) behavioral health have been identified; however, it is unclear if integrated care impacts healthcare utilization, including urgent care and non-F2F contact. We sought to investigate the association between patient engagement with GI behavioral health and healthcare utilization. We performed a retrospective chart review study of adult patients who were referred for and completed at least one behavioral health appointment between January 1, 2019 and December 21, 2021 in the Gastroenterology and Hepatology department of a large academic medical center. Data on electronic medical record (EMR) messages, phone calls, and Emergency Department utilization were collected 6months before and 9months after patient engagement with GI behavioral health. 466 adult patients completed at least one behavioral health visit from 2019 to 2021. Overall, messages, phone calls, and ED visits all decreased significantly from the 6months before behavioral health treatment to 6months after (all P values < 0.001). Engagement with integrated GI behavioral health is associated with reduced non-F2F care and emergency department utilization in patients with chronic digestive disorders. Increasing access to GI behavioral health may result in reduced provider workload and healthcare system costs.

Changes in emergency department utilization by neonates during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a single-center study in Korea

Changes in emergency department utilization by neonates during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a single-center study in Korea

Emergency Department Utilization by Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Basrah, Iraq

Emergency Department Utilization by Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in Basrah, Iraq

Pediatric mental health emergency department visits from 2017 to 2022: A multicenter study.

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected children's mental health (MH) and changed patterns of MH emergency department (ED) utilization. Our objective was to assess how pediatric MH ED visits during the COVID-19 pandemic differed from expected prepandemic trends. We retrospectively studied MH ED visits by children 5 to <18 years old at nine U.S. hospitals participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry from 2017 to 2022. We described visit length by time period: prepandemic (January 2017-February 2020), early pandemic (March 2020-December 2020), midpandemic (2021), and late pandemic (2022). We estimated expected visit rates from prepandemic data using multivariable Poisson regression models. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) of observed to expected visits per 30 days during each pandemic time period, overall and by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We identified 175,979 pediatric MH ED visits. Visit length exceeded 12 h for 7.3% prepandemic, 8.4% early pandemic, 15.0% midpandemic, and 19.2% late pandemic visits. During the early pandemic, observed visits per 30 days decreased relative to expected rates (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.84), were similar to expected rates during the midpandemic (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07), and then decreased below expected rates during the late pandemic (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). During the late pandemic, visit rates were higher than expected for females (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20) and for bipolar disorders (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.38-2.75), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.59), and substance-related and addictive disorders (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-2.05). During the late pandemic, pediatric MH ED visits decreased below expected rates; however, visits by females and for specific conditions remained elevated, indicating a need for increased attention to these groups. Prolonged ED visit lengths may reflect inadequate availability of MH services.

A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Complications and Healthcare Utilizations After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Area Deprivation Index: Consideration of the Disadvantaged Patient

INTRODUCTIONSocioeconomic status (SES) has been demonstrated to be an important prognostic risk factor among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. We evaluated patients living near neighborhoods with higher socioeconomic risk undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and if they were associated with differences in: 1) medical complications; 2) emergency department (ED) utilizations; 3) readmissions; and 4) costs of care. METHODSA query of a national database from 2010 to 2020 was performed for primary TKAs. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a weighted index comprised of 17 census-based markers of material deprivation and poverty. Higher numbers indicate a greater disadvantage. Patients undergoing TKA in zip codes associated with high ADI (90%+) were 1:1 propensity-matched to a comparison group by age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). This yielded 225,038 total patients, evenly matched between cohorts. Outcomes studied included complications, ED utilizations, readmission rates, and 90-day costs. Logistic regression models computed the odds ratios (OR) of ADI on the dependent variables. P-values less than 0.003 were significant. RESULTSHigh ADI led to higher rates and odds of any medical complications (11.7 versus 11.0%; OR: 1.05, P = 0.0006), respiratory failures (0.4 versus 0.3%; OR: 1.28, P = 0.001), and acute kidney injuries (1.7 versus 1.5%; OR: 1.15, P < 0.0001). Despite lower readmission rates (2.9 versus 3.5%), high ADI patients had greater 90-day ED visits (4.2 versus 4.0%; OR: 1.07, P = 0.0008). The 90-day expenditures ($15,066 versus $12,459; P < 0.0001) were higher in patients who have a high ADI. CONCLUSIONSocioeconomically disadvantaged patients have increased complications and ED utilizations. Neighborhood disadvantage may inform healthcare policy and improve post-discharge care. The SES metrics, including ADI (which captures community effects), should be used to adequately risk-adjust or risk-stratify patients so that access to care for deprived regions and patients is not lost.

Public Health Literacy and Emergency Department Utilization in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Health literacy (HL) is the degree in which individuals are able to access, comprehend, and use publicly available health resources and services. A previous study was done in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) assessing the prevalence of HL, the study shows that almost half of KSA residents had limited HL. Most studies that show the level of HL and its relationship to emergency department (ED) utilization were conducted outside KSA. This study aims to assess the association between HL and utilization of ED services and to estimate the prevalence, factors, and outcomes of low HL in KSA. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 903 participants in KSA over a period of 2 months (April and May 2023) using an online survey. Participants were asked about sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, nationality, marital status, education, work status, income), associated factors (chronic diseases, psychiatric disorders, Covid-19 infection, Covid-19 vaccination, ED visits), and Health Literacy (read, access, understand, evaluation, decision). A health literacy instrument for adults (HELIA), which consists of the previously mentioned five subscales, was used to estimate the level of HL and its association with the risk factors. Almost 529 (58.58%) and 374 (41.42%) had limited HL and adequate HL, respectively. Participants with limited HL were mostly aged 35-45 years (61.7%), men (p < 0.05) (68.9%), divorced (65.9%), non-Saudi (69.6%), and had elementary level of education (66.7%). Participants with adequate HL had master's and PhD degree (48.1%), were healthcare students or graduates (62.8%, p < 0.05), had an income >30 thousand riyals (55.6%, p < 0.05), were previously infected with COVID-19 (43%), and did not visit ED in the preceding year (42.3%). A high prevalence of low HL among KSA residents was observed. There was no significant difference in ED utilization between participants who had adequate and limited HL.

Management of youth with suicidal ideation: Challenges and best practices for emergency departments.

Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth, and emergency departments (EDs) play an important role in caring for youth with suicidality. Shortages in outpatient and inpatient mental and behavioral health capacity combined with a surge in ED visits for youth with suicidal ideation (SI) and self-harm challenge many EDs in the United States. This review highlights currently identified best practices that all EDs can implement in suicide screening, assessment of youth with self-harm and SI, care for patients awaiting inpatient psychiatric care, and discharge planning for youth determined not to require inpatient treatment. We will also highlight several controversies and challenges in implementation of these best practices in the ED. An enhanced continuum of care model recommended for youth with mental and behavioral health crises utilizes crisis lines, mobile crisis units, crisis receiving and stabilization units, and also maximizes interventions in home- and community-based settings. However, while local systems work to enhance continuum capacity, EDs remain a critical part of crisis care. Currently, EDs face barriers to providing optimal treatment for youth in crisis due to inadequate resources including the ability to obtain emergent mental health consultations via on-site professionals, telepsychiatry, and ED transfer agreements. To reduce ED utilization and better facilitate safe dispositions from EDs, the expansion of community- and home-based services, pediatric-receiving crisis stabilization units, inpatient psychiatric services, among other innovative solutions, is necessary.

Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization: Caregiver Motivations.

Proper emergency department (ED) utilization is a hallmark of population health. Emergency department overcrowding due to nonurgent visits causes increased stress to healthcare staff, higher costs, and longer wait times for more urgent cases. This study sought to better understand post pandemic reasons caregivers have when bringing in their children for nonurgent visits and devise effective interventions to improve caregiver choice for non-ED care for nonurgent conditions. Surveys were conducted at an urban pediatric hospital for Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level 3 to 5 visits. A total of 602 surveys were completed with 8 being excluded from analysis. Survey responses and anonymized demographic information were collected. Responses were compared between surveys grouped by respondent age category, relation to child, child's race, insurance type, and ESI levels. Primary reasons given for nonurgent ED visits were perceived urgency (74.2%, n = 441), ED superiority to other locations (23.9%, n = 142), and referral to the ED by a third party (17.7%, n = 105). Of those who cited perceived urgency as a reason, 80.5% (n = 355) wanted to lessen their child's pain/discomfort as soon as possible, but only 13.6% said that their child was too ill to be seen anywhere else (n = 60). Demographic differences occurred in the proportions of respondents citing some of the primary and secondary reasons for bringing their child to the ED. This study highlights 3 key findings. An immediate desire for care plays a key role in caregiver decision making for low-acuity visits. There is potential socioeconomic and racial bias in where care is recommended that needs to be further explored in this region. Cross community interventions that target key reasons for seeking low-acuity care have the highest likelihood of impacting the use of the ED for low-acuity conditions.

Emergency Department Utilization Measured Through Bounce Back Rate is Significantly Higher in Homeless Patients

Emergency Department Utilization Measured Through Bounce Back Rate is Significantly Higher in Homeless Patients

A Pilot Project of a Post Discharge Care Team for Firearm Injury Survivors Decreases Emergency Department Utilization, Hospital Readmission Days, and Cost.

Persons of low socioeconomic status are overrepresented in the firearm injury patient population and may experience challenges in accessing complex outpatient health systems. Consequently, outpatient care for these patients is plagued by poor follow-up and increased emergency department (ED) utilization. We developed a Post Discharge Care Team (PDCT) consisting of a dedicated trauma nurse navigator and medical social worker to bridge the gap between hospital discharge and outpatient care to improve recovery. Adult firearm injury survivors admitted to the trauma service were randomized 1:1 to receive either PDCT services or standard of care (SOC) workflows. The PDCT nurse provided education and set expectations regarding injuries, wound care, and outpatient follow up. The PDCT social worker performed a comprehensive assessment to identify concerns including housing and financial instability, food insecurity, or transportation issues. The primary outcome was ED utilization, with secondary outcomes including readmissions and overall healthcare costs compared between groups. In the first six months of the study, a total of 44 patients were randomized to PDCT and 47 to SOC. There were 10 patients who visited the ED in the PDCT group compared to 16 in the SOC group (p = 0.23) for a total of 14 and 23 ED visits, respectively. There were 14 patients in the PDCT and 11 patients in the SOC groups who were readmitted (p = 0.31), but the PDCT group was readmitted for 27.9 fewer hospital days. After accounting for programmatic costs, the PDCT had a hospital savings of $34,542.71. A collaborative, specialized Post Discharge Care Team for firearm injury survivors consisting of a dedicated trauma nurse navigator and medical social worker decreased outpatient ED utilization, readmission days, and was cost effective. Trauma centers with high volumes of penetrating trauma should consider a similar model to improve outpatient care for firearm injury survivors. Original Research, Quality Improvement, 2.

Examining the Role of Self-Harm in the Relationship between Emergency Department Service Utilization and Trauma-Induced Homelessness among Homeless Individuals in Texas.

Homelessness is a complex public health problem in the United States. Current or ongoing history of trauma among individuals adds to the complexity and challenges of homelessness. Our study assessed the moderating role of self-harm in the association between emergency department (ED) service utilization and trauma-induced homelessness (TIH) among adults in Texas. Homeless adults (N = 282) who completed their baseline Vulnerability Index Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Prescreen Tool survey between February 2021 and February 2022 at a Local Mental Health Authority in Texas were selected. The outcome variable, TIH, was assessed by current period of homelessness due to experiencing trauma or abuse. The main independent variable was ED utilization, while self-harm in the past year was assessed as the moderating variable. A multivariate logistic regression with a moderation analysis was conducted while adjusting for the covariates. Individuals who utilized ED services and engaged in self-harm and risky behaviors had greater odds of experiencing current period of TIH. Male respondents were less likely to experience TIH. Finally, engaging in self-harm significantly moderated the association between ED service use and TIH. This study may help inform efforts to develop tailored interventions and promote resilience-based approaches to improve health outcomes among individuals experiencing homelessness due to TIH.

Drug Use-Related Discrimination in Healthcare Settings and Subsequent Emergency Department Utilization in a Prospective Cohort Study of People With a History of Injection Drug Use

Background: People with a history of injection drug use face discrimination in healthcare settings that may impede their use of routine care, leading to greater reliance on the emergency department (ED) for addressing health concerns. The relationship between discrimination in healthcare settings and subsequent ED utilization has not been established in this population. Methods: This analysis used longitudinal data collected between January 2014 and March 2020 from participants of the ALIVE (AIDS Linked to the IntraVenous Experience) study, a community-based observational cohort study of people with a history of injection drug use in Baltimore, Maryland. Logistic regressions with generalized estimating equations were used to estimate associations between drug use-related discrimination in healthcare settings and subsequent ED utilization for the sample overall and six subgroups based on race, sex, and HIV status. Results: 1,342 participants contributed data from 7,289 semiannual study visits. Participants were predominately Black (82%), mostly male (66%), and 33% were living with HIV. Drug use-related discrimination in healthcare settings (reported at 6% of study visits) was positively associated with any subsequent ED use (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.15–1.72). Positive associations persisted after adjusting for covariates, including past sixth-month ED use and drug use, among the overall sample (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04–1.59) and among some subgroups. Conclusions: Drug use-related discrimination in healthcare settings was associated with greater subsequent ED utilization in this sample. Further exploration of mechanisms driving this relationship may help improve care and optimize healthcare engagement for people with a history of injection drug use.

Real-World Evidence of Antipsychotic Monotherapy Versus Polypharmacy in the Treatment of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

It is still not well known whether antipsychotic monotherapy versus polypharmacy differs in terms of efficacy in the emergency department (ED) utilization, presentation with agitation/aggression, and rehospitalization in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) patients. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy for these outcomes in the real world. The study was conducted with electronic health records of 669 SSD patients admitted to the ED. Patients were evaluated in 4 groups according to antipsychotic use at the first admission to ED: antipsychotic noncompliance for more than 90 days, antipsychotic noncompliance for 15 to 90 days, antipsychotic monotherapy, and polypharmacy. All patients followed up for at least 1 year after index admission. The primary outcomes determined an association between antipsychotic monotherapy versus polypharmacy and all-cause psychiatric hospitalization between the groups after index admission in the SSD. The groups, including patients with antipsychotic noncompliance, had higher ED visits, more hospitalizations, and more admissions with agitation/aggression compared with antipsychotic monotherapy or polypharmacy. However, no differences were found between monotherapy and polypharmacy groups regarding these outcomes. In addition, there was no difference in the risk of hospitalization in monotherapy antipsychotic users compared with polypharmacy users. Patients discharged with monotherapy or polypharmacy also had similar rehospitalization rates at follow-up. There is no positive evidence that recommending polypharmacy over antipsychotic monotherapy is superior with regard to the resulting frequency of ED visits, ED admissions with agitation/aggression, hospitalization, and rehospitalization. In this context, antipsychotic monotherapy may be preferred over polypharmacy in patients who are not resistant to treatment.

Breaking the Emergency Room Cycle: The Impact of Telemedicine on Emergency Department Utilization.

Background Telemedicine has gained prominence in healthcare, and understanding its impact on diverting non-urgent cases from the emergency room (ER) has become crucial. This study delves into the dynamic relationship between telemedicine utilization and ERvisits, seeking to understand the transformative impact of telehealth on breaking the traditional ER cycle. Method To explore the awareness and utilization of telemedicine services in the broader population of Saudi Arabia, we adopted a cross-sectional design utilizing the convenience sampling method. Data collection was facilitated through a self-administered online survey comprising four sections: demographic variables, ER visits, awareness of non-urgent cases, and suggestions. The collected data were entered into IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) for descriptive analysis. Results Among the 1140 participants, the majority were females (56.8%), with 43.2% being males. Regarding age distribution, the highest percentage fell within the 18-25 age group (46.8%). Nationality-wise, a substantial proportion identified as Saudi (95.2%). Educational backgrounds varied, with 60.7% holding a bachelor's degree. Notably, 62.6% of the visits were classified as urgent. A significant portion (66.8%) demonstrated awareness of alternative options for non-urgent care, such as outpatient clinics and telemedicine services. Specifically regarding telemedicine, 82.8% of respondents believed that video consultations and prescription refills could effectively address non-urgent conditions. Furthermore, 89.6% of participants agreed that educating patients on self-care and home remedies could help manage symptoms and deter unnecessary ER visits. Conclusions The positive reception of telemedicine, as evidenced by high satisfaction rates among participants, further reinforces its role in reshaping the landscape of healthcare delivery.